ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025
Identification of oncology pharmacokinetic drivers through in vitro experiments and computational modeling.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery balances many factors as it identifies compounds for clinical testing, including compound efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, commercial feasibility, competitive positioning, and organizational pressures to move quickly with limited knowledge. When considering target engagement within clinically acceptable dosing constraints, design elements often balance potency requirements against the required extent of target engagement, which subsequently inform the PK design criteria (e.g. absorption and half-life considerations). Hence, an early understanding of the magnitude and duration of target engagement can focus design teams by providing well defined design criteria. To this end, an in vitro target engagement assay has been developed to bin targets and compounds by the type of target engagement profile required for efficacy (cellular anti-proliferation). This in turn directionally informs on the required concentration profile most aligned with the efficacy readout, bucketing results into three primary categories that drive efficacy: high transient concentrations, average concentrations, and threshold concentrations. This manuscript will outline the methodology developed for this early target coverage assessment and provide examples with selected compounds spanning molecularly targeted and cytotoxic oncology small molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40699396What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.