Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699362›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Diurnal variation and practice effects in saccade task performance.

Thomas Karantinos, Evi Kotsiou, Panagiota Drouza, Asimakis Mantas, Andrew J Anderson, Christoph Klein, Nikolaos Smyrnis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas KarantinosLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and sensorimotor control, Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", University Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Evi KotsiouLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and sensorimotor control, Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", University Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Panagiota DrouzaLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and sensorimotor control, Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", University Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Asimakis MantasLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and sensorimotor control, Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", University Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Andrew J AndersonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Christoph Klein2nd Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", 1 Rimini St., Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos SmyrnisLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and sensorimotor control, Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", University Mental Health, Athens, Greece. smyrnis@med.uoa.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movement tasks have been widely used as a probe for measuring cognitive functions in healthy humans as well as in patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Circadian variation has been shown to affect multiple aspects of cognitive function especially executive function related to prefrontal cortex. The effects of diurnal variation in saccadic task performance and the dissociation of these effects from repetition or practice effects has not been adequately addressed. In the current study thirty healthy adults performed several saccadic eye movement tasks including visually guided saccades, antisaccades and countermanding saccades in three consecutive sessions. Participants were divided into three groups, with a different starting time of the sequence of the three sessions across groups (morning or afternoon or evening) to examine the effect of diurnal variation (time of day that the tasks were performed) separated from the effect of session repetition (practice effect). The results showed no effect of diurnal variation for all indexes of saccadic eye movement performance including accuracy (antisaccade and countermanding saccade tasks) speed (mean latency in all tasks) and stability (intra-subject standard deviation of latency in all tasks). In contrast, saccadic task repetition significantly improved accuracy, speed and stability of performance indicating the presence of practice effects in these tasks. Finally, linear mixed model analysis confirmed no interaction between diurnal variation and practice effects for all indexes of saccadic eye movement performance. In conclusion our study provides confirmation that saccadic task performance is not affected by diurnal variation related to circadian rhythms. In contrast, short term repetition of these tasks results in significant practice effects.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmPractice, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAntisaccadeCountermanding saccadeGap saccadeOculomotor tasksSaccadic latencyVisually guided saccade

Identifiers

PMID40699362
PMCPMC12287220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.