ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2025
Phenotypic and functional trait variation in Malvastrum coromandelianum under different tree plantations in Pakistan.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.) Garcke (Malvaceae) is a widely distributed herbaceous species known for its ecological adaptability and invasive behavior in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. In plantation forests, such invasive understory species can alter community composition, affect regeneration, and influence ecosystem functioning. Understanding their trait plasticity across contrasting tree plantation environments is critical for managing understory biodiversity and assessing the ecological consequences of afforestation practices. This study examined the phenotypic and functional responses of M. coromandelianum across different tree plantations in Pakistan, focusing on how canopy-driven microclimatic variation and soil physicochemical conditions influence its morphological, physiological, and anatomical traits. Results revealed that functional trait responses were highly variable and plantation-specific. Plant height, shoot length, and glycine betaine accumulation were highest under Morus nigra, corresponding with elevated soil phosphorus and calcium, while the longest roots and highest proline levels occurred under Melia azedarach, where soil calcium and magnesium were also enriched. The smallest individuals were observed under Tecomella undulata, where higher sodium and lower nutrient availability may have constrained growth. Ion concentrations in plant tissues varied significantly across plantation types, generally aligning with soil ion availability-for instance, elevated shoot and root sodium under Melia azedarach corresponded with higher soil salinity, while calcium accumulation was greatest in soils with higher calcium. Leaf anatomical traits, including thicker mesophyll and midrib tissues under Morus nigra, suggested resource-acquisitive strategies, while root epidermis and stem sclerenchyma thickening under Conocarpus lancifolius reflected stress-tolerant adaptations. Structural traits varied along the Leaf-Stem-Root Economics Spectrum (LSRES), indicating a balance between conservative and acquisitive strategies depending on resource availability. These findings highlight the species considerable plasticity in response to integrated canopy and soil factors. However, given its invasive nature, M. coromandelianum should not be promoted for use in ecological restoration without careful consideration of its ecological impacts. Instead, its consistent trait responses make it a potentially valuable bioindicator for assessing understory microhabitat conditions, especially in semi-arid plantations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40699336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.