ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Delphi consensus on the transition from pediatric to adult care in Italian ADHD youth.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and performance of primary healthcare physicians toward diagnosis and management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder at PHC centers in Riyadh second health cluster, Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for improving the transition of care for young adults with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) in Italy. A modified Delphi consensus method was employed, involving 27 stakeholders, including child psychiatrists, psychiatrists, psychologists, primary care physicians, young adults with ADHD, and parents. Recommendations were drafted by combining data from prior phases of the Transition in young adults with Diabetes, Epilepsy, and ADHD (TransiDEA) project and international guidelines (e.g., NICE, Ready Steady Go). Stakeholders evaluated 33 proposed recommendations across two rounds, rating their relevance and feasibility. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement per item. Consensus was achieved on 22 recommendations organized into four categories: planning (14 items), passage (4 items), monitoring (1 item), and services (3 items). Key recommendations included starting transition planning at age 16, involving families and interdepartmental teams, implementing practical tools for information exchange, and monitoring young adults outcomes post-transition. Training for clinicians and service self-assessment were emphasized to address systemic barriers. The final shared recommendations integrate multiple perspectives and international best practices and provide a structured, adaptable framework for improving ADHD care transitions in Italy. Future efforts should evaluate their implementation and expand the methodology to other neurodevelopmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40699327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.