ArticleAnatomical science international2025
Introduction to the CLEM technique developed in the field of neuroanatomy.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
CLEM, which allows the observation of the same structure using both light and electron microscopes, is becoming increasingly popular in various fields in recent years as molecular and cell biology research deepens and experimental techniques become more sophisticated. Although CLEM is often considered a specialized technique, it has been used for 40 years to observe neuroanatomy since the era of Golgi-EM, so it does not require specialized equipment and can be applied relatively easily to various tissues and even cultured cells at a single cell level. The specific methodology is introduced here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.