Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699245›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Incidence and predictors of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Fang Fei Lyu, Min Zhang, Yuan Fen Deng, Qian Liu, Qian Yang, Li Rong Xia

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fang Fei LyuSchool of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Min ZhangYunnan Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Yuan Fen DengYunnan Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Qian LiuYunnan Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Qian YangYunnan Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Li Rong XiaYunnan Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China. 1105585750@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence and predictors of residual back pain (RBP) following percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remain unclear. This review aims to clarify these factors to guide clinical practice and enhance patient outcomes. Four English and three Chinese databases were systematically searched from their inception until June 1, 2024. Data were analyzed using Stata 16.0. Incidence rates of RBP were pooled from all included studies, and predictors identified in two or more studies were aggregated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for stability and reliability. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the causes of heterogeneity, while Begg, Egger test, and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. This meta-analysis included 27 studies with a total of 8,806 patients, found that the incidence rate of RBP in patients with OVCFs after PVA was 24.4% (95% CI: 19.5-29.3%). Seventeen predictors for RBP were identified, which included demographic and personal history factors, injury characteristics, and bone cement and postoperative factors. The most frequent predictor was low preoperative bone density (OR = 2.208, 95% CI: 2.018-2.415, p < 0.001), followed by thoracolumbar fascia injury (OR = 3.875, 95% CI: 2.752-5.457, p < 0.001) and maldistribution of bone cement (OR = 2.065, 95% CI: 1.728-2.467, p < 0.001). Fifteen risk factors and two protective factors for RBP were identified. These findings highlight the importance of thorough preoperative assessment and meticulous surgical technique in reducing the risk of RBP in patients with OVCFs undergoing PVA. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the incidence and predictors of residual back pain (RBP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) who had underwent percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA).The findings identified a total of fifteen risk factors and two protective factors associated with RBP. Specifically, low preoperative bone density, thoracolumbar fascia injury, and maldistribution of bone cement were revealed to be the most common predictors.

Indexed as

Back PainFractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesPostoperative PainSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyBone CementsBone DensityHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsBone CementsBack painIncidenceOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesPercutaneous vertebral augmentationPredictor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.