Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699210›Full record

RevieweLife2025

Bioengineering approaches to trained immunity: Physiologic targets and therapeutic strategies.

Hannah Riley Knight, Marie Kim, Nisha Kannan, Hannah Taylor, Hailey Main, Emily Azcue, Aaron Esser-Kahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pleiotropic Mucosal Innate Immune Memory in the Gastrointestinal Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah Riley KnightPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-9985
Marie KimPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-6618
Nisha KannanPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-5340
Hannah TaylorBiological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-8764
Hailey MainDepartment of Chemistry, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0460-8512
Emily AzcuePritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1088-8854
Aaron Esser-KahnPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-0951

Funding

Discovery of adjuvants via novel modulation of innate immune pathways for vaccines against influenza75N93019C00041 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ESSER-KAHN, AARON · 2019 to 2024
$10.0M
Medical Scientist National Research Service AwardT32GM150375 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Raghavendra G Mirmira · 2023 to 2026
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00041NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM150375NIH MSTP NIH T32GM150375NSF GRFP NSF 2140001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trained immunity presents a unique target for modulating the immune response against infectious and non-infectious threats to human health. To address the unmet need for training-targeted therapies, we explore bioengineering methods to answer research questions and address clinical applications. Current challenges in trained immunity include self-propagating autoinflammatory disease, a lack of controllable cell and tissue specificity, and the unintentional induction of training by known drugs and diseases. The bioengineering tools discussed in this review (nanotherapeutics, biomechanical modulation, cellular engineering, and machine learning) could address these challenges by providing additional avenues to modulate and interrogate trained immunity. The preferential activation of peripheral or central training has not yet been achieved and could be accessed using nanoparticle systems. Targeted delivery of training stimuli using nanocarriers can enrich the response in various cell and organ systems, while also selectively activating peripheral training in the local tissues or central trained immunity in bone marrow progenitor cells. Beyond chemical- or pathogen-based activation of training, force-based cues, such as interaction with mechanoreceptors, can induce trained phenotypes in many cell types. Mechanotransduction influences immune cell activation, motility, and morphology and could be harnessed as a tool to modulate training states in next-generation therapies. For known genetic and epigenetic mediators of trained immunity, cellular engineering could precisely activate or deactivate programs of training. Genetic engineering could be particularly useful in generating trained cell-based therapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) macrophages. Finally, machine learning models, which are rapidly transforming biomedical research, can be employed to identify signatures of trained immunity in pre-existing datasets. They can also predict protein targets for previously identified inducers of trained immunity by modeling drug-protein or protein-protein interactions in silico. By harnessing the modular techniques of bioengineering for applications in trained immunity, training-based therapies can be more efficiently translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

BioengineeringAnimalsHumansMachine LearningTrained Immunitybioengineeringbiomechanicscellular engineeringimmunologyinflammationmachine learningnanotherapeuticstrained immunity

Identifiers

PMID40699210
PMCPMC12286607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.