ReviewJournal of virology2025
Zoonotic disease risk at traditional food markets.
Review in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zoonotic public health risks in farmed versus wild-caught wildlife for traditional markets for food: A systematic review and meta-analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Synergistic Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of (KW)Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026Article
- Drivers of Viral Spillover: An Examination of How Pathogens Spread.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Operationalizing metagenomic data from environmental surveillance for one health decision-making in live animal markets: Findings from a multisectoral workshop in Cambodia.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Analysis of Rabies Outbreaks in the European Union and Türkiye (2013-2023).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular detection of CTX-M ESBL-encoding genes inOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Detection of theVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Essential contributions of wildlife health surveillance to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.One health outlook · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional food markets (TFMs) are dynamic and complex systems that play a vital role in societies across the globe. They provide fresh, affordable food, help preserve cultural traditions, and support the livelihoods of millions. However, these markets also present inherent risks associated with the trade of live animals and animal-derived products, including the emergence and spread of zoonotic diseases, which are underreported in these settings. This review explores the dual role of TFMs as essential societal hubs and hotspots for zoonotic diseases, emphasizing the need for surveillance and targeted One Health research on pathogens in these environments. By assessing the health risks associated with the presence of specific animals and their pathogens in TFMs, this review lays the foundation for developing the evidence-based risk assessments and mitigation strategies needed to reduce zoonotic disease risk. Enhancing the safety and sustainability of TFMs through integrated One Health approaches will be crucial for balancing the cultural and economic importance of TFMs with the need for increased global health security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.