ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Monitoring and evaluation indicators of Freestanding Birth Centers: results of the study Births in Brazilian Birthing Centers].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the monitoring and evaluation indicators of Freestanding Birth Centers (FBC) in Brazil. This cross-sectional study was aligned with the survey Birth in Brazil II. All eight FBC that attended more than 100 births in 2019 were included in this study. Data referred to 2020 or 2021 and were collected from interviews with service managers and a structured instrument made available online. Variables correspond to all 12 monitoring and evaluation indicators provided for in the ordinance by the Brazilian Ministry of Health for the accreditation of FBC. Results showed that the service attended 3,097 births in a year. Nurses/midwives attended 96.9% of these births and 98.7% of them included a companion of the woman's choice. Amniotomy was performed in 15.7% of labors; oxytocin and episiotomy were used in 7% and performed in 0.4% of them, respectively; 60.2% of births occurred in the vertical position; and the perineum remained intact in 32.2% of them. As for the newborns, 0.6% had five-minute Apgar scores < 7 and 97.6% had skin-to-skin contact with their mothers. The intrapartum, postnatal, and neonatal transfers rates totaled 17.3%, 2.6%, and 4.3%, respectively. The indicators of the FBC show that this model of care offers mothers and babies safe, respectful, human-centered care that is based on the best scientific evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.