Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699041›Full record

ArticleArquivos de gastroenterologia2025

OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING PANCREATODUODENECTOMY (WHIPPLE'S PROCEDURE) ACCORDING TO THE PRESENCE OF PREOPERATIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE.

Rómulo Vargas-Rubio, Ana Maria Leguizamo-Naranjo, Oscar Muñoz-Velandia, Cristiam David Pulgarin-Herrera, Carlos Ernesto Lombo, Liliana Cuevas-Lopez, Elio Fabio Sanchez, Francisco Javier Henao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de gastroenterologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rómulo Vargas-RubioGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-6229
Ana Maria Leguizamo-NaranjoGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-7947
Oscar Muñoz-VelandiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-0018
Cristiam David Pulgarin-HerreraGastroenterology Fellowship Program, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-458X
Carlos Ernesto LomboGastroenterology Fellowship Program, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-7554
Liliana Cuevas-LopezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-3864
Elio Fabio SanchezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-8493
Francisco Javier HenaoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-4502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy is the procedure of choice for the treatment of resectable pancreaticoduodenal tumours. It has been proposed that jaundice is associated with worse outcomes, but the usefulness of preoperative biliary drainage in these patients is still controversial.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of patients undergoing Whipple procedure at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá (Colombia), between January 2010 and June 2023. The cohort of patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage was compared with those who went directly operated on. Comorbidities, functional status and procedural characteristics were recorded. The outcomes, including mortality and intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications, were compared between groups.

resultsA total of 98 patients were included, 49 of whom underwent preoperative biliary drainage. In this group, there was a higher proportion of patients with pathological stage II and III disease (77.5 vs 49.0, P=0.04) and higher preoperative bilirubin levels (median 6.4 vs 4.9 mg/dL; P=0.02). There were no differences in intraoperative (10.2% vs 14.3%; P=0.34) or postoperative (61.2% vs 51%; P=0.15) complications, but 30-day mortality was higher in patients with biliary drainage (8.2 vs 20.4%; P=0.03).

conclusionOur data suggest that there are no differences in postoperative complications. The higher mortality rate in patients with preoperative biliary drainage may be related to differences in baseline patient characteristics and/or delays between biliary drainage and Whipple procedure.

background• The usefulness of preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing Whipple procedure is still controversial.

background• Our data suggest that there are no differences in postoperative complications.

background• 30-day mortality is higher in patients with biliary drainage maybe related to differences in baseline characteristics and/or delays between biliary drainage and Whipple procedure.

Indexed as

DrainagePancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPreoperative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40699041
PMCPMC12289290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.