ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2025
Droplet microfluidics for single-cell studies: a frontier in ecological understanding of microbiomes.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scalable Droplet Microfluidic Platform That Overcomes Large-Cell Constraints for Long-Term Plant Cell Culture and Embryogenesis Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Accessible, robust ultrahigh-throughput microbiome analysis via integration of uniform droplet-templated emulsification and FACS.PloS one · 2026Article
- Microfluidics to Meet Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Research Frontier.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- High-throughput bacterial aggregation analysis in droplets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differential recovery of chain-elongating bacteria: comparing droplet, plating, and dilution-to-extinction methods.mSystems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in single-cell technologies have profoundly impacted our understanding of microbial communities-shedding light on cell-to-cell variability in gene expression, regulatory dynamics, and metabolic potential. These approaches have shown that microbial populations are more heterogeneous and functionally complex than previously thought. However, direct probing of single-cell physiology-arguably more ecologically relevant by focusing on functional traits such as growth, metabolic activity, and enzymatic activity-remains underexplored. Droplet microfluidics provides a practical and high-throughput approach to address this gap, allowing functional characterization of individual microbial cells within complex communities and offering new opportunities to study ecological processes at high resolution. In this review, we look at the state of droplet microfluidics for single-cell microbial ecology. We revisit the fundamentals of microbial droplet workflows, we overview the current capabilities of droplet microfluidics that exist for microbial ecology and we look at the phenomena these workflows have uncovered and understanding they have generated. Finally, we integrate these capabilities to envision future droplet workflows that could enhance our understanding of single-cell physiology and discuss the fundamental limitations that go together with the droplet format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.