ReviewActa orthopaedica2025
Antimicrobial resistance in orthopedics: microbial insights, clinical impact, and the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach-a review.
Review in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiofilm-coated intramedullary nailing for tibial and femoral diaphyseal fractures at high-risk infection: outcomes of 103 consecutive patients.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026Observational
- The effect of elevated physiological temperatures on bacterial survival and antibiotic susceptibility in anFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Test parameter selection affects the perceived antibacterial efficacy of a contact-killing coating developed to prevent prosthetic joint infection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is rising globally and is a threat and challenge for orthopedic surgery, particularly in managing prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This review first explores several AMR mechanisms from a microbiological point of view, including selective pressure, horizontal gene transfer, and further dissemination. Second, the variation in the rise of AMR across countries is highlighted, including its impact on PJI. While countries with the highest AMR rates are expected to experience the most significant burden, no country will be immune to the increasing prevalence of PJI. Third, this review stresses that multidimensional strategies are needed to combat AMR's challenges in orthopedic surgery. These include raising awareness across all sectors, including healthcare professionals, the public, healthcare policymakers, and even politicians; advancing diagnostic technologies for early infection detection and classification of resistant or susceptible strains; promoting antibiotic stewardship; and developing new material technologies to prevent or cure PJI. This review highlights the urgent need for a coordinated response from clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to avoid AMR-related complications in PJI cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.