ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
A multi-stage 3D convolutional neural network algorithm for CT-based lung segment parcellation.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-stage 3D convolutional neural network algorithm for CT-based lung segment parcellation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent approaches to lung parcellation utilize established fissures between lobes to provide estimates of lobar volume. However, deep learning segment parcellation provides the ability to better assess regional heterogeneity in ventilation and perfusion. PURPOSE: We aimed to validate and demonstrate the clinical applicability of CT-based lung segment parcellation using deep learning on a clinical cohort with mixed airways disease.
methodsUsing a 3D convolutional neural network, airway centerlines were determined using an image-to-image network. Tertiary bronchi were identified on top of the airway centerline, and the pulmonary segments were parcellated based on the spatial relationship with tertiary and subsequent bronchi. The data obtained by following this workflow was used to train a neural network to enable end-to-end lung segment parcellation directly from 123 chest CT images. The performance of the parcellation network was then evaluated quantitatively using expert-defined reference masks on 20 distinct CTs from the training set, where the Dice score and inclusion rate (i.e., percentage of the detected bronchi covered by the correct segment) between the manual segmentation and automatic parcellation results were calculated for each lung segment. Lastly, a qualitative evaluation of external validation was performed on 20 CTs prospectively collected by having two radiologists review the parcellation accuracy in healthy individuals (n = 10) and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 10).
resultsMeans and standard deviation of Dice score and inclusion rate between automatic and manual segmentation of twenty patient CTs were 86.81 (SD = 24.54) and 0.75 (SD = 0.19), respectively, across all lung segments. The mean age of the qualitative dataset was 54.4 years (SD = 16.4 years), with 45% (n = 9) women. There was 99.2% intra-reader agreement on average with the produced segments. Individuals with COPD had greater mismatch compared to healthy controls.
conclusionsA deep-learning algorithm can create parcellation masks from chest CT scans, and the quantitative and qualitative evaluations yielded encouraging results for the potential clinical usage of lung analysis at the pulmonary segment level among those with structural airway disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.