Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698593›Full record

ReviewActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2025

The Life of a Kidney Podocyte.

Desiree Loreth, Wiebke Sachs, Catherine Meyer-Schwesinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Life of a Kidney Podocyte.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Desiree LorethInstitute of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wiebke SachsInstitute of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Catherine Meyer-SchwesingerInstitute of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-5188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPodocytes, highly specialized epithelial cells located in the glomerulus of the kidney, are essential to the filtration barrier that ensures separation of blood and urine. These cells exhibit a unique architecture, characterized by an intricate network of foot processes interconnected by slit diaphragms, which serve as a critical selective filter for plasma ultrafiltration. This review focusses on synthesizing current knowledge on podocyte physiology, emphasizing the roles of key proteins, signaling pathways, and environmental factors that influence their function.

methodsPublications featuring current advances in molecular biology and imaging techniques were used to summarize new insights into the regulatory pathways governing podocyte homeostasis, as well as the mechanisms of injury and repair.

resultsThe biology of podocytes encompasses diverse processes, including cytoskeletal dynamics, cellular signaling, and interactions with neighboring cells and the extracellular matrix. Disruption of podocyte structure or function is fundamental to a variety of glomerular diseases, which can lead to proteinuria and progressive kidney failure.

conclusionUnderstanding the intricate mechanisms involved in maintaining podocyte homeostasis offers potential therapeutic strategies to protect and restore podocyte integrity, addressing a critical need in nephrology. By highlighting the intricate balance required for podocyte survival, we reinforce their significance as both a cornerstone of renal filtration and a focal point in kidney disease research.

Indexed as

PodocytesAnimalsHomeostasisHumansKidney GlomerulusSignal Transductionactin cytoskeletondegradationfoot processmetabolismphysiologypodocytepolarityregenerationslit diaphragm

Identifiers

PMID40698593
PMCPMC12284917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.