ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Association of Perceived Xingfu With Health-Related and Socioeconomic Factors Among Hong Kong Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using a Novel Single-Item Tool.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Xingfu (), a Chinese term, holds meanings that transcend Western concepts of happiness; it is modern and highly valued in China. Despite its centrality to China's national discourse on xingfu, there are no validated tools for measuring perceived xingfu, particularly in Hong Kong's unique sociopolitical context. Postpandemic recovery efforts and widening socioeconomic disparities in Hong Kong highlight the urgency of understanding indicators such as perceived xingfu. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the first single-item measure of perceived xingfu and examine its association with health-related and socioeconomic factors among Hong Kong Chinese adults, addressing gaps in culturally tailored assessment. Methods: Our cross-sectional online survey included 5070 Hong Kong Chinese adults in 2023. Perceived xingfu was measured using a novel, single-item, 11-point scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived xingfu. Two-week test-retest showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78). We used regression models to analyze associations between perceived xingfu score and high perceived xingfu (defined as ≥7) with mutually adjusted study variables; all estimates were weighted based on 2022 Hong Kong population data. Results: The mean perceived xingfu score was 6.3 (SD 2.2). Perceived xingfu score was associated with happiness (r=0.85), perceived mental health (r=0.65), and adversity coping capability (r=0.50) and negatively associated with perceived stress (r=-0.56), past 7-days loneliness (r=-0.52), anxiety symptoms (r=-0.45), and depressive symptoms (r=-0.52). Female sex (β=0.69, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.11), older age (β=0.46, aOR 2.67), having post-secondary education or above (β=0.19, aOR 1.35), higher monthly household income (≥ HKD60,000: β=0.99, aOR 3.04), living in owned properties (β=0.27, aOR 1.57), being retired (β=0.56, aOR 1.18), and excellent versus poor self-rated health (β=3.84, aOR 40.72) were associated with higher perceived xingfu score or high perceived xingfu (all Ps or Pstrend<0.001). Conclusions: This study pioneers the perceived xingfu measurement in a Chinese population using a concise, validated tool. Significant socioeconomic disparities and health associations highlight perceived xingfu's relevance to policy priorities, including equitable resource allocation and health support. Our single-item perceived xingfu tool offers practical utility for population surveillance and cross-cultural comparisons. Future research should explore longitudinal trends and integrate perceived xingfu into public health frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.