Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698573›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Association of Perceived Xingfu With Health-Related and Socioeconomic Factors Among Hong Kong Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using a Novel Single-Item Tool.

Katherine Y P Sze, Sai Yin Ho, Agnes Yuen Kwan Lai, Jing Jia, Heng Xu, Shirley Man Man Sit, Tai Hing Lam, Man Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine Y P SzeSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, 5/F, HKUMed Academic Building, 3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 39176636.ORCID 0009-0008-9553-7789
Sai Yin HoSchool of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-9485-0273
Agnes Yuen Kwan LaiSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-7321-2632
Jing JiaSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, 5/F, HKUMed Academic Building, 3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 39176636.ORCID 0000-0002-5408-0603
Heng XuDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-3801-5032
Shirley Man Man SitSchool of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-8429-707X
Tai Hing LamSchool of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-2033-9971
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, 5/F, HKUMed Academic Building, 3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 39176636.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-2388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Xingfu (), a Chinese term, holds meanings that transcend Western concepts of happiness; it is modern and highly valued in China. Despite its centrality to China's national discourse on xingfu, there are no validated tools for measuring perceived xingfu, particularly in Hong Kong's unique sociopolitical context. Postpandemic recovery efforts and widening socioeconomic disparities in Hong Kong highlight the urgency of understanding indicators such as perceived xingfu. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the first single-item measure of perceived xingfu and examine its association with health-related and socioeconomic factors among Hong Kong Chinese adults, addressing gaps in culturally tailored assessment. Methods: Our cross-sectional online survey included 5070 Hong Kong Chinese adults in 2023. Perceived xingfu was measured using a novel, single-item, 11-point scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived xingfu. Two-week test-retest showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78). We used regression models to analyze associations between perceived xingfu score and high perceived xingfu (defined as ≥7) with mutually adjusted study variables; all estimates were weighted based on 2022 Hong Kong population data. Results: The mean perceived xingfu score was 6.3 (SD 2.2). Perceived xingfu score was associated with happiness (r=0.85), perceived mental health (r=0.65), and adversity coping capability (r=0.50) and negatively associated with perceived stress (r=-0.56), past 7-days loneliness (r=-0.52), anxiety symptoms (r=-0.45), and depressive symptoms (r=-0.52). Female sex (β=0.69, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.11), older age (β=0.46, aOR 2.67), having post-secondary education or above (β=0.19, aOR 1.35), higher monthly household income (≥ HKD60,000: β=0.99, aOR 3.04), living in owned properties (β=0.27, aOR 1.57), being retired (β=0.56, aOR 1.18), and excellent versus poor self-rated health (β=3.84, aOR 40.72) were associated with higher perceived xingfu score or high perceived xingfu (all Ps or Pstrend<0.001). Conclusions: This study pioneers the perceived xingfu measurement in a Chinese population using a concise, validated tool. Significant socioeconomic disparities and health associations highlight perceived xingfu's relevance to policy priorities, including equitable resource allocation and health support. Our single-item perceived xingfu tool offers practical utility for population surveillance and cross-cultural comparisons. Future research should explore longitudinal trends and integrate perceived xingfu into public health frameworks.

Indexed as

HappinessAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcross-sectional studyhealth-related factorsHong Kongperceived xingfu (幸福感)socioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID40698573
PMCPMC12284738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.