Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698567›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dermatology2025

Evaluating the Quality of TikTok Videos on Vitiligo: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hilla Rosenberg, Yael Hollander, Chaya Bracha Gordon, Reut Rotem, Amir Horev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hilla RosenbergFaculty of Health Sciences, ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3231-7546
Yael HollanderFaculty of Health Sciences, ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7625-2609
Chaya Bracha GordonFaculty of Health Sciences, ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-1892
Reut RotemDepartment of Urogynecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4063-5911
Amir HorevFaculty of Health Sciences, ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-9061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVitiligo, an autoimmune disorder causing skin depigmentation, significantly impacts quality of life. With over 1 billion users, TikTok has become a major platform for health information dissemination. However, its engagement-driven algorithm raises concerns about misinformation. This study evaluates the accuracy of the most-liked vitiligo-related TikTok videos and examines the platform's role in health education.

methodsWe retrieved TikTok videos using "#Vitiligo" and analyzed the first 100 videos that met inclusion criteria. Videos were categorized into healthcare providers (HP) and non-healthcare providers (NHP). Content characteristics and engagement metrics were extracted. Three independent reviewers assessed quality using multiple assessment tools-Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and Global Quality Score (GQS). A novel tool, V-TRACE, was developed to evaluate (1) clinical aspects (pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and autoimmune comorbidities) and (2) social aspects (body image and representation of people of color).

resultsOf 100 videos analyzed, 25% were from HP, demonstrating significantly higher quality across all metrics. HP videos focused on education (96% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) and scored higher on mDISCERN (2.66 vs. 1.66, p < 0.01), GQS (2.66 vs. 1.6, p < 0.01), and VIQI (12.33 vs. 10.00, p < 0.01). NHP produced 75% of videos, received higher engagement (p = 0.04), and had a more positive tone (30.7% vs. 12%, p = 0.05).

conclusionVitiligo-related TikTok content lacks reliability. HPs produce higher-quality content, while NHPs dominate engagement and potentially spread misinformation. There is a need for more evidence-based, engaging content to improve patient education on the platform.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationPatient Education as TopicSocial MediaVideo RecordingVitiligoCross-Sectional StudiesHumansadolescentshealth educationsocial mediaTikTokvitiligo

Identifiers

PMID40698567
PMCPMC12605712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.