Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698537›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2025

Hepatitis B Virus NAT Positive Donors in Non-Hepatic Organ Transplant: Quantifying Viral Loads to Optimize Recipient Risk Stratification and Management in the Prevention of Donor-Derived Infection.

Patrick C K Tam, Goni Katz-Greenberg, Cameron R Wolfe, Kristen Lott, Carl L Berg, Adam D DeVore, John M Reynolds, Jennifer L Saullo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Donor-derived viral infections: the usual suspects and the new kids on the block.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrick C K TamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-1889
Goni Katz-GreenbergDivision of Nephrology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-4156
Cameron R WolfeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-5030
Kristen LottDuke Transplant Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carl L BergDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adam D DeVoreDivision of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-2221
John M ReynoldsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer L SaulloDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation is one of the few life-saving therapies for patients with end-stage organ disease, yet organ availability remains restrictive. Expanding donors to include those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, incorporating HBV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) positive donors, could improve organ access. However, the risk of donor-derived HBV transmission and recipient management of organs transplanted from HBV NAT-positive donors, particularly in thoracic organ recipients, is limited. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to assess the safety and outcomes in recipients of non-hepatic organ transplants from HBV NAT-positive donors. Over a 4.5-year period, 25 transplant recipients, including 16 thoracic organ recipients, received organs from 22 unique, qualitative HBV NAT-positive donors. All recipients were HBV surface antibody-positive prior to transplant. Quantitative NAT was performed in 20/22 (91%) donors with values ranging from 0 to 1 280 000 IU/mL; 8/22 (36%) donors had HBV NAT values that were undetected or below the lower limit of quantification. All recipients were administered HBV immunoglobulin (HBIG) and received HBV active antiviral therapy post-transplant. Recipients were followed post-transplant for a median of 250 days (IQR: 169-467 days). No recipients developed de novo HBV infection characterized by HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, quantifiable HBV NAT detection, or sustained HBV core antibody (HbcAb) seroconversion post-transplant. Similarly, no recipient developed liver dysfunction or died due to HBV infection. Quantifying HBV from NAT-positive donors may better inform the risk of donor-derived infection in recipients, and the use of these organs incorporating a multimodal prevention strategy could safely increase the donor pool.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralHepatitis BHepatitis B virusNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesOrgan TransplantationTissue DonorsViral LoadAdultDonor SelectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisDNA, Viraldonor‐derived hepatitisentecavirHepatitis B virusimmunoglobulinkidney transplantationthoracic transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40698537
PMCPMC12284844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.