Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698392›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2025

Advances in Peptidomimetics for Next-Generation Therapeutics: Strategies, Modifications, and Applications.

Lucia Lombardi, Valentina Del Genio, Fernando Albericio, Daryl R Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Novel Peptide-Triazole Conjugates: Strategic Synthesis, Antimicrobial Properties, and Molecular Docking Study.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Semaphorins and Their Role in Neuropathic Pain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Photoredox-Catalyzed Lysine C(spJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia LombardiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5202-9847
Valentina Del GenioDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Fernando AlbericioSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-0462
Daryl R WilliamsDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-5903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, peptide drug discovery has experienced a remarkable renaissance, with organic chemistry and biotechnology emerging as pivotal tools for developing peptidomimetics that exhibit improved stability, specificity, and bioavailability compared to conventional peptides. This review systematically examines methodologies for modifying peptide backbones to achieve targeted properties, highlighting recent advances facilitated by modern biotechnological innovations for novel molecular transformations. Additionally, the review emphasizes the practical applications of peptides and peptidomimetics, showcasing their successful integration into medicine and pharmacology. This manuscript evaluates achievements and challenges in the field and identifies critical areas for further research. Its overarching aim is to synthesize current knowledge and propose strategic directions for advancing peptide-based therapeutics.

Indexed as

PeptidesPeptidomimeticsAnimalsDrug DiscoveryHumansPeptidesPeptidomimetics

Identifiers

PMID40698392
PMCPMC12355721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.