Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698377›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025

Trends in congenital heart disease mortality in the United States from 1968 to 2022.

Zahra Imran, Taimor Mohammed Khan, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Raheel Ahmed, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zahra ImranDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Taimor Mohammed KhanDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saad Ahmed WaqasDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Raheel AhmedNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abdul Mannan Khan MinhasSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Congenital heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of infant mortality due to birth defects in the United States. We analyzed long-term CHD mortality trends across age, sex, and racial groups from 1968 to 2022. Methods: We extracted CHD mortality data from the CDC WONDER database (1968-2022), using ICD-8/9/10 codes. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude mortality rates (CMRs) were calculated per 100,000 population. Joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends in mortality, reporting annual percentage changes (APCs) and average APCs (AAPCs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: From 1968 to 2019, 234,658 CHD-related deaths were recorded. Overall AAMR declined from 3.2 (1968) to 0.8 (2019) per 100,000 (AAPC: -2.7 %; 95 % CI: -2.9 to -2.5). Males consistently had higher AAMRs than females. Racial disparities persisted, with slower declines among Black or African American individuals. Infants under 1 year accounted for 56.0 % of CHD deaths and showed the steepest mortality decline (AAPC: -3.2 %). Mortality rates plateaued in recent years. Conclusions: CHD mortality in the U.S. has declined markedly over the past five decades, though progress has slowed since 2009. Persistent disparities by race and sex emphasize the need for equitable access to specialized CHD care and ongoing public health efforts.

Indexed as

CongenitalEpidemiologyHeart defectsMortalityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40698377
PMCPMC12280409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.