Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698336›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Effects of Crop Rotation Diversification and Livestock Integration on Above-Ground Arthropod Dynamics Under Conservation Agriculture.

Amandrie Louw, Johann Strauss, Pia Addison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amandrie LouwDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-5032
Johann StraussWestern Cape Department of Agriculture Elsenburg South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-5343
Pia AddisonDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-339X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversification through integrating diverse crop species and livestock is key to enhancing above-ground arthropod diversity and promoting the sustainability of cropping systems within conservation agriculture (CA) in South Africa. This study compared two crop rotation treatments, A (Wheat-Wheat-Wheat-Wheat) and G (Canola-Medics-Wheat-Medics), as part of a long-term CA trial conducted in a wheat-producing region of South Africa. For crop rotation system G, each phase of the rotation sequence was represented in separate plots annually. Surface-dwelling arthropods were sampled using pitfall traps, while plant-dwelling arthropods were captured through sweep-net sampling. These methods comprehensively assessed above-ground arthropod diversity 90 days after crop emergence. The results showed that crop rotation diversification positively influenced arthropod diversity, though the effects varied depending on the arthropod group and sampling position. Ground-dwelling arthropods exhibited less pronounced differences between crop rotation systems, whereas plant-dwelling arthropods displayed more crop-specific variations. Analysis of individual arthropod orders revealed that the effects of crop rotation diversification varied across different arthropod groups. Our findings emphasize the importance of examining multiple arthropod groups to understand diversification's impacts fully within CA farming systems.

Indexed as

canolaground‐dwelling arthropodsplant‐dwelling arthropodswheat

Identifiers

PMID40698336
PMCPMC12279553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.