ArticleHealth science reports2025
Factors for Oral Intake Recovery in Acute Illness Patients With Dysphagia: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This study examined to identify predictive factors for oral intake recovery in patients with acute illness after discharge from an acute care hospital. Methods: The prospective cohort study was conducted at an acute care hospital between January and December 2020. Among 3359 consecutive patients who required speech therapy rehabilitation after acute illness treatment, those with oral intake difficulty were selected. After discharge, patients were followed up at home care service, long-term care facility, or sub-acute hospital. Difficulty in oral intake was defined based on the dysphagia grade by speech-language pathologists and overall oral intake consumption. The primary outcome measure was the recovery of total oral intake 90 days after discharge. We analyzed the clinically relevant factors for oral intake recovery using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Among 512 patients with severe dysphagia and insufficient oral intake upon discharge, 410 were ultimately included (response rate: 80.0%) from 106 facilities, comprising a home care service, a long-term care facility, and another hospital. The mean age was 83.2 years, with 52.9% of the patients being men. The median length of the hospital stay was 27 days. Overall, 195 (47.4%) patients survived, and 57 (13.9%) recovered their oral intake 90 days after discharge. In the multivariable analysis, the absence of nocturnal suctioning (adjusted odds ratio = 3.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-7.5, Conclusion: The factors identified in this study may contribute to prognosis of patients who can recover their oral intake at discharge from acute care hospitals and to the implementation of appropriate discharge plans and artificial hydration and nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.