ArticleCJC open2025
Association of Frailty With Readmissions and Outcomes After Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Frailty is associated with a greater risk of readmission after cardiovascular procedures. However, the impact of frailty on readmission rates and outcomes after Impella mechanical circulatory support (MCS) remains unknown. We aimed to explore the impact of frailty on readmission outcomes in patients who received Impella MCS. Methods: Using the National Readmissions Database, patients aged 65 years and older who received Impella MCS between January 2016 and December 2020 were identified. Frailty was determined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), which stratifies patients into 3 frailty risk categories as low (<5), intermediate (5-15), and high (>15), with intermediate- and high-risk groups defined as frail. The impact of frailty on short-term (within 30 days) and midterm (31-180 days) readmission rates and in-hospital outcomes was assessed. Results: Of the 16,289 patients identified in the 30-day cohort, 8647 (53.1%) were identified as frail (HFRS ≥5) and 2185 (13.4%) had an unplanned readmission at 30 days. After adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, frailty status (HFRS ≥5) was associated with a greater risk of 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.37), death (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.22-3.30), major adverse events (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.29-2.33), length of stay >4 days (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.44-2.26) and greater hospitalization expenditures (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.17-1.80) during readmission. Of the 6497 patients identified in the 31-180-day cohort, 3521 (54.2%) were considered frail and 1809 (27.8%) experienced unplanned readmissions. An HFRS ≥5 was associated with a greater risk of readmission (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.88-2.34), in-hospital death (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.33-6.86), length of stay >4 days (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.29-2.14), and greater hospital expenditures (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75) during 31-180-day readmission. Conclusions: Frailty is common among patients undergoing Impella MCS and is associated with higher rates of readmission and adverse outcomes during readmission.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.