ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Postmarket Study of Silimed's Silicone Gel Polyurethane Foam-covered Breast Implants: Interim Results (2018-2024).
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Octopus Mastopexy: A True "Implant-First" and On-Demand Approach Based on Parenchymal Reduction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Postmarket Study of Silimed's Silicone Gel Polyurethane Foam-covered Breast Implants: Interim Results (2018-2024).Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Reply: Postmarket Study of Silimed's Silicone Gel Polyurethane Foam-covered Breast Implants: Interim Results (2018-2024).Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Silimed silicone gel polyurethane (PU) foam-covered breast implants are used worldwide. There is extensive clinical experience with the long-term use of these implants, but scientific evidence on this topic remains limited. This report assessed the interim data on the performance and safety of these implants. Methods: This is a postmarketing, phase IV, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm trial. Participants were selected consecutively based on their attendance at the research center during the enrollment period. The main eligibility criteria were primary or revision augmentation and the absence of conditions possibly increasing the short-term risk of adverse events. Silimed's PU breast implants were the intervention. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Outcomes of major interest were implant rupture, reoperation, and capsular contracture. Efficacy was measured through satisfaction, and quality of life was measured by the BEQ55 questionnaire. Patient demographics, surgical details, implant characteristics, and postoperative results were recorded. Results: This study enrolled 342 patients. The satisfaction rate was 88.69% for primary augmentation and 86.00% for revision. After 5 years, no instances of capsular contracture or implant rupture were reported. Reoperations occurred in 1.76%: 5 involved implant replacement, and 1 did not. The seromas identified during the study occurred within 8 weeks after surgery; therefore, there were no cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma . Conclusions: Silimed PU breast implants demonstrated favorable safety and high efficacy over the follow-up period. The low incidence of capsular contracture and the absence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma support the use of PU implants in breast augmentation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.