Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698266›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Capillary Blood for Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: The PSA-CAP Study.

Martin Wallisch, Peter Albers, Nikolaus Becker, Friedrich Boege, Derik Hermsen, Tanmay Ramesh Londhe, Jale Lakes, Jan Philipp Radtke, Agne Krilaviciute, Petra Seibold and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06626386 (Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen in Capillary Blood), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06626386 recruitingnot on this map

Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen in Capillary Blood (PSA-Cap)

TypeobservationalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2024 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsProstate CancerArmsPSA testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Martin WallischDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter AlbersDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nikolaus BeckerDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Friedrich BoegeCentral Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Derik HermsenCentral Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tanmay Ramesh LondheCentral Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jale LakesDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jan Philipp RadtkeDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Agne KrilaviciuteDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Petra SeiboldDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Axel BennerDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Maral SaadatiDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan HoldenriederInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Rouvier Al-MonajjedDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk-adapted prostate cancer (PC) screening is currently based on a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, risk assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classical venous blood sampling is usually performed by health care professionals, which may reduce participation in future population-based screening programmes due to limited resources. The PSA-CAP study (NCT06626386) evaluated the feasibility of using capillary blood from fingertip sampling compared with venous blood for PSA determination, in order to facilitate access for PSA testing. This prospective study analysed 196 men aged 40-75 yr. PSA levels were measured from both capillary and venous blood using the same analytical method. The stability of samples stored at room temperature was assessed over a week. Discomfort associated with both collection methods was evaluated using a numerical pain scale. No significant differences were found between capillary and venous PSA measurements. Samples remained stable up to 7 d without immediate centrifugation. Pain scores for capillary (1.52/10) and venous (1.61/10) collections were generally low and not significantly different ( Patient summary: We studied an alternative method of blood collection to measure prostate-specific antigen level, a key test for prostate cancer risk, using fingertip sampling instead of venous blood. The results were comparable with and as stable as those from venous blood collection, with similar comfort levels. This technique may simplify future prostate cancer screening programmes and could lead to a higher acceptance rate.

Indexed as

Capillary bloodPopulation-based screeningProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenRisk-adapted screening

Identifiers

PMID40698266
PMCPMC12281128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.