ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Capillary Blood for Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: The PSA-CAP Study.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06626386 (Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen in Capillary Blood), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Determination of Prostate-specific Antigen in Capillary Blood (PSA-Cap)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk-adapted prostate cancer (PC) screening is currently based on a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, risk assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classical venous blood sampling is usually performed by health care professionals, which may reduce participation in future population-based screening programmes due to limited resources. The PSA-CAP study (NCT06626386) evaluated the feasibility of using capillary blood from fingertip sampling compared with venous blood for PSA determination, in order to facilitate access for PSA testing. This prospective study analysed 196 men aged 40-75 yr. PSA levels were measured from both capillary and venous blood using the same analytical method. The stability of samples stored at room temperature was assessed over a week. Discomfort associated with both collection methods was evaluated using a numerical pain scale. No significant differences were found between capillary and venous PSA measurements. Samples remained stable up to 7 d without immediate centrifugation. Pain scores for capillary (1.52/10) and venous (1.61/10) collections were generally low and not significantly different ( Patient summary: We studied an alternative method of blood collection to measure prostate-specific antigen level, a key test for prostate cancer risk, using fingertip sampling instead of venous blood. The results were comparable with and as stable as those from venous blood collection, with similar comfort levels. This technique may simplify future prostate cancer screening programmes and could lead to a higher acceptance rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.