Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698265›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Adaption of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Nomograms for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer-specific Death in Sweden: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Renata Zelic, Marcus Westerberg, Pär Stattin, Hans Garmo, Lorenzo Richiardi, Olof Akre, Andreas Pettersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renata ZelicDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus WesterbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pär StattinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hans GarmoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lorenzo RichiardiCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Olof AkreDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas PetterssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Prognostication is a cornerstone of the clinical management of prostate cancer. This study aims to update the pre- and postoperative Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomograms for the prediction of 10-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in the competing risk setting in Sweden, and to evaluate the added value of comorbidities. Methods: A cohort study was conducted including all men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with localised prostate cancer in 2007-2020, who underwent radical prostatectomy. Follow-up was until December 31, 2022. We used cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models to obtain the cumulative incidence of prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality. The models were validated in terms of discrimination (concordance [C] index) and calibration by internal-external validation in six Swedish health care regions and by bootstrapping ( Key findings and limitations: The cohort included 31 106 men, of whom 629 died from prostate cancer and 2415 died from other causes during a median follow-up of 8.3 yr (interquartile range: 5.2, 11.8). Comorbidities added more value to the other-cause mortality model than to the prostate cancer-specific mortality model, and were included in all models. Both the preoperative and the postoperative model showed high discrimination for prostate cancer-specific death (optimism-corrected C-index: 0.81 and 0.87, respectively), but not for other-cause mortality (0.67, both models). All models were well calibrated, with minimal overestimation at the higher range of predicted cumulative incidences for the preoperative, but not for the postoperative, model. Conclusions and clinical implications: The updated MSKCC nomograms performed well in terms of discrimination and calibration, and can be used in clinical practice in Sweden. In this study, comorbidity added minimal prognostic value for predicting prostate cancer-specific mortality. External validation is advised for application in other populations. Patient summary: Prognostication is a cornerstone in the clinical management of prostate cancer. In this study, we adapted the best preforming risk classification system, the pre- and postoperative Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomograms, for the prediction of prostate cancer-specific death in Swedish setting. The adapted models perform well and can be applied directly to Swedish men with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Competing risk analysisNomogramOther-cause mortalityPrognostic modelPrognostic model updatingProstate cancerProstate cancer–specific mortalityRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID40698265
PMCPMC12281531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.