Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698263›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Real-world Evidence from a Retrospective Multicentre Analysis on First-line Therapy for Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. A GUARDIANS Project.

Thomas Hilser, Jozefina Casuscelli, Can Aydogdu, Stefanie Zschäbitz, Marco Julius Schnabel, Emily Rinderknecht, Angelika Mattigk, Martin Schostak, Anna-Lisa Volk, Philipp Ivanyi and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Thomas HilserDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jozefina CasuscelliDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Can AydogduDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie ZschäbitzDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marco Julius SchnabelDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Emily RinderknechtDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Angelika MattigkDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Martin SchostakDepartment for Urology, Urooncology, Robot-assisted and Focal Treatment, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Anna-Lisa VolkDepartment for Urology, Urooncology, Robot-assisted and Focal Treatment, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Philipp IvanyiDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Claudia-von Schelling Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jonas WiegmannDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Claudia-von Schelling Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christopher DarrDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Luka FlegarDepartment of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Subhajit MandalDepartment of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Katrin SchlackDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Daniel SeidlDepartment of Urology, Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Analena HandkeDepartment of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany.
Melanie KleeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Tim NestlerDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Marc RehlinghausDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sameh HijaziDepartment of Urology, Ibbenbueren Hospital, Ibbenbueren, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Viktor GrünwaldDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pia PaffenholzDepartment of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a rare disease. The optimal treatment of metastatic pRCC is still unclear. We evaluated real-world treatment outcomes of first-line treatment in this cohort in Germany. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic pRCC were eligible. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall response rate was accessed according to the local standard. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised, where appropriate. Key findings and limitations: In total, 121 suitable patients (77% male) with a median age of 63 yr (quartiles 55, 70) were included. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 78%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 was reported in 74%. Lymphatic (68%) and pulmonary (42%) metastases were most common. Of the patients, 59% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies (ICI-ICI: 20%, tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]-ICI: 39%), and 41% of patients received TKI monotherapy, predominantly sunitinib. The median follow-up time was 33.3 mo (interquartile range 14.8-46.7). The median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-7.6) for ICI-ICI combinations, 16.9 mo (95% CI: 7.2-26.6) for ICI-TKI combinations, and 8.8 mo (95% CI: 7.0-10.7) for TKI monotherapy. Of all the patients, 70% and 35% experienced all-grade and grade 3-5 AEs, respectively. AEs of any cause led to discontinuation in 33% of patients. Conclusions and clinical implications: TKI-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC patients. Our data support the use of ICI plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. The major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up of our study. Additional analyses to tailor treatment strategies in patients with metastatic pRCC are warranted. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the outcome of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC. Our data support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. However, further studies are needed to optimise treatment in patients with metastatic pRCC.

Indexed as

First-line treatmentImmune checkpoint inhibitorPapillary renal cell cancerTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40698263
PMCPMC12280342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.