ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Real-world Evidence from a Retrospective Multicentre Analysis on First-line Therapy for Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. A GUARDIANS Project.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a rare disease. The optimal treatment of metastatic pRCC is still unclear. We evaluated real-world treatment outcomes of first-line treatment in this cohort in Germany. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic pRCC were eligible. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall response rate was accessed according to the local standard. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised, where appropriate. Key findings and limitations: In total, 121 suitable patients (77% male) with a median age of 63 yr (quartiles 55, 70) were included. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 78%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 was reported in 74%. Lymphatic (68%) and pulmonary (42%) metastases were most common. Of the patients, 59% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies (ICI-ICI: 20%, tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]-ICI: 39%), and 41% of patients received TKI monotherapy, predominantly sunitinib. The median follow-up time was 33.3 mo (interquartile range 14.8-46.7). The median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-7.6) for ICI-ICI combinations, 16.9 mo (95% CI: 7.2-26.6) for ICI-TKI combinations, and 8.8 mo (95% CI: 7.0-10.7) for TKI monotherapy. Of all the patients, 70% and 35% experienced all-grade and grade 3-5 AEs, respectively. AEs of any cause led to discontinuation in 33% of patients. Conclusions and clinical implications: TKI-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC patients. Our data support the use of ICI plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. The major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up of our study. Additional analyses to tailor treatment strategies in patients with metastatic pRCC are warranted. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the outcome of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC. Our data support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. However, further studies are needed to optimise treatment in patients with metastatic pRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.