Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698239›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Labour Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Perceptions, Experiences, and Sociocultural Influences on Pain and Its Management Practices.

Archita Tandon, Kanwal Gujral, Vipin Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Archita TandonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Kanwal GujralInstitute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, NEW DELHI, IND.
Vipin GuptaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childbirth is a deeply personal and subjective experience for women, shaped by individual expectations and sociocultural perceptions. Many women approach labour with specific mental imagery and expectations regarding pain and the birthing process. However, these expectations often differ from the actual experience, which can result in emotional distress during and after childbirth. This scoping review systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies published between 1984 and 2024 focusing on labour pain perception and experience. Only peer-reviewed articles in English were considered. This review identified three major themes that highlighted labour pain, pain management, and the sociocultural factors that were associated with it. It has revealed that the experience of women was consistent with what they had perceived about pain, while it was inconsistent in terms of perception of pain relief during labour. However, the sociocultural paradigm did hold its place in meddling between the perceptions and experiences of these women during labour pain and management. The exploration of personal attributes and sociocultural dynamics that shaped the women's ascription of meanings to labour pain add context to how a similar physiological experience can be perceived and experienced differently.

Indexed as

experiencelabour painpain managementperceptionssociocultural factors

Identifiers

PMID40698239
PMCPMC12282679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.