ReviewCureus2025
Labour Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Perceptions, Experiences, and Sociocultural Influences on Pain and Its Management Practices.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Pain and Comfort During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Labor Pain Management Practices and Associated Factors Among Licensed Obstetric Care Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Nursing-led childbirth preparedness sessions: enhancing self-efficacy and maternal outcomes among primiparous women.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Predictors of labour pain among primigravida mothers: A prospective observational study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Effects of SP6 Acupressure on Labor Pain During Childbirth Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childbirth is a deeply personal and subjective experience for women, shaped by individual expectations and sociocultural perceptions. Many women approach labour with specific mental imagery and expectations regarding pain and the birthing process. However, these expectations often differ from the actual experience, which can result in emotional distress during and after childbirth. This scoping review systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies published between 1984 and 2024 focusing on labour pain perception and experience. Only peer-reviewed articles in English were considered. This review identified three major themes that highlighted labour pain, pain management, and the sociocultural factors that were associated with it. It has revealed that the experience of women was consistent with what they had perceived about pain, while it was inconsistent in terms of perception of pain relief during labour. However, the sociocultural paradigm did hold its place in meddling between the perceptions and experiences of these women during labour pain and management. The exploration of personal attributes and sociocultural dynamics that shaped the women's ascription of meanings to labour pain add context to how a similar physiological experience can be perceived and experienced differently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.