ReviewCureus2025
Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in the Management of Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled phase Ia clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of tofacitinib tartrate cream (HZ-J001) in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Tofacitinib safety in inflammatory bowel disease: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Synovial macrophage-targeted hierarchical microspheres achieve cartilage preservation and pain relief in osteoarthritis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Latent and Active Tuberculosis Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Who Received Biological Treatment.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for filgotinib.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis that can severely impair the quality of life. Although biologic therapies have significantly advanced disease management, a substantial number of patients continue to experience suboptimal treatment outcomes. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, in the management of AS. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases for studies published between 2015 and 2025, ultimately including 11 relevant studies (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine post-hoc or observational analyses). Evidence consistently demonstrated that tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to placebo, with Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response rates of approximately 80% in controlled trials. Tofacitinib demonstrated a rapid onset of action, with improvements in pain occurring within one month and benefits across multiple domains, including fatigue, morning stiffness, and quality of life. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies confirmed significant reductions in sacroiliac joint and spinal inflammation. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in other indications, with nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory infections being the most common adverse events. Limited cases of herpes zoster were reported, with no documented tuberculosis, malignancies, or thromboembolic events within the study periods. The review supports tofacitinib as an effective option for AS management, with efficacy maintained across various patient subgroups. However, longer-term studies and head-to-head comparisons with biologics are needed to establish its optimal position in treatment algorithms for AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.