ReviewmicroLife2025
CRISPR-Cas induced self-targeting identifies key players in archaeal microhomology-mediated end joining.
Review in microLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HELQ & Hel308: ancient enzymes of DNA repair and recombination.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA repair processes are the foundation for genome integrity and survival, especially in extreme environments where DNA damage occurs more frequently and where archaea are found. Nevertheless, first-hand experimental information on repair pathways in archaea is scarce, and assignment of repair proteins is currently largely based on homology. We showed previously that DNA lesions induced by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats Cas (CRISPR-Cas) self-targeting are repaired by microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). To identify proteins involved in the archaeal MMEJ pathway, we used deletion strains devoid of proteins assigned to the key steps of MMEJ, to examine changes in the repair outcome. In addition, we used aphidicolin to inhibit the activity of the essential PolB1 protein. For the first time, we were thereby able to experimentally identify proteins involved in this repair pathway in the euryarchaeal model organism
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.