Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698098›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology

The effect of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment for patients with age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.

Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy, Cansu Erseven, Büşra Erel, Sadık Görkem Çevik, İrfan Perente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahmut Oğuz UlusoyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Research and Training Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Cansu ErsevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Research and Training Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Büşra ErelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Research and Training Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Sadık Görkem ÇevikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beyoğlu Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
İrfan PerenteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beyoğlu Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment routine for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods. Methods: We evaluated the data of intravitreal injections between March 2020 and June 1, 2021, which was the last day of official restrictions. We divided into two groups: a regular treatment group and a group that was interrupted for at least 3 months without excuse. The initial visual acuity at the beginning of the pandemic, the last visual acuity, the visual acuity after interruption, the central macular thickness, and the interruption time were recorded. Results: A total of 156 patients' data were evaluated. There are forty-eight patients in the regular treatment group, 77 in the interruption group, and 31 in the discontinued group. The visual loss was significantly higher in the interruption group (respectively, -0.11 ± 0.19 vs. 0.03 ± 0.16, p<0.001). Central macular thickness changes were higher in the interruption group (respectively, 31.8 ± 5.7µm vs. 13.5 ± 4.6, p<0.001). The mean interruption time was 6.71 ± 2.45 months. Discussion: Half of the patients in our study interrupted their treatment during the pandemic, and this interruption had a negative impact on their visual acuity and central macular thickness. In addition to COVID-19's own high mortality and morbidity, it also had adverse effects on patients who required regular follow-up and treatment. Conclusion: Since interruptions in treatment negatively impact the prognosis of AMD, effective protocols that do not require frequent visits are necessary.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsCOVID-19Macular DegenerationPandemicsQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Visual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aage-related macular degenerationAMD = age related macular degenerationCMT = central macular thicknessCNV = choroidal neovascularizationCOVID-19COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 19intravitreal injectionpandemicPRN = pro re nataSD-OCT = spectral domain optical coherence tomgraphyVEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID40698098
PMCPMC12277991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.