Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40698010›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2025

Improving sperm selection strategies for assisted reproduction through closing the knowledge gap in sperm maturation mechanics.

Hanah May Hart, Brett Nixon, Jacinta Hope Martin, Robert John Aitken, Geoffry Nunzio De Iuliis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanah May HartCentre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6352-7841
Brett NixonCentre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-8188
Jacinta Hope MartinCentre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-5150
Robert John AitkenCentre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9152-156X
Geoffry Nunzio De IuliisCentre for Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-6123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale factors contribute to ∼50% of all infertility cases globally and are a major contributor to escalating use of ART. In most instances, sub-fertile men retain the ability to produce spermatozoa, albeit with reduced quality and function. By necessity, an important feature of ART is the use of technologies that bypass the natural selection barriers that prevent poor-quality spermatozoa from participating in fertilization. This means that ART carries a significant risk of facilitating fertilization with poor-quality gametes harbouring undetected DNA damage and/or altered epigenomes. Such a scenario may account for the epidemiological links between the use of 'high intervention' technologies [e.g. ICSI] and an increased risk of adverse offspring outcomes. Such data highlight a pressing need for improved sperm selection tools that better mimic natural selection barriers, to ensure only the highest-quality spermatozoa are used for ART. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Current sperm selection techniques for ART and the processes underpinning sperm maturation have often been considered independently and therefore reviewed separately. Here we outline the requirement for connecting research paradigms towards advancing clinical outcomes. This review highlights the importance of combining our advancing knowledge of sperm maturation biology with the pursuit of rational sperm selection strategies for the clinic; specifically, this narrative review summarizes the current clinical technologies used for sperm selection with a focus on their physiological relevance and limitations. We have given consideration to the events associated with sperm maturation and the importance of zona pellucida (ZP) binding as inspiration to inform the development of the next generation of sperm selection strategies. The connections and information presented should provide utility and interest for both clinicians and reproductive biologists alike. SEARCH

methodsThe PubMed database was queried using the keywords: sperm selection/function/DNA quality/epigenome, ART, ICSI, male infertility, capacitation, zona pellucida, sperm-zona pellucida binding, DNA damage, and biofabrication. These keywords were combined with other relevant phrases. Literature was restricted to peer-reviewed articles in English (published between 1972 and 2024) with references within these articles also searched. OUTCOMES: During natural conception, high-quality sperm are 'selected', maximizing the chances of fertilization with healthy gametes carrying intact genomic/epigenetic cargo. This sub-population of spermatozoa possess the capacity to interact with the female reproductive tract and complete the suite of functional maturation processes required for successful fertilization and initiation of embryonic development. However, ART 'high intervention' strategies bypass these selective barriers leading to an increased risk of inadvertently transferring genomic defects to the offspring with potential downstream consequences for offspring health. This review contextualizes why current sperm selection technologies have provided only minor improvement to live birth rates following ART. We posit that capitalizing on sperm-ZP binding (the penultimate step of successful fertilization) with novel ZP mimetic technologies provides an attractive, but understudied, tool for clinical selection of fertilization-competent spermatozoa for ART improvement. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The risk of bias in the interpretation of findings for a narrative review cannot be completely eliminated. Literature was limited to the language the authors speak: English. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: ART has provided transformative advancement for infertile couples, however, gaps in our fundamental understanding of how the best gametes are 'selected' during natural conception, which when unaccounted for during clinical conception, present a risk of continued reliance on ART and health consequences for the next generation. The purpose of this article was to contextualize our current knowledge across both sperm maturation events and current selection strategies for these cells in the clinic. We outline the potential for improved clinical outcomes through the advancement of our understanding in gamete biology in concert with the development of novel methods for artificial gamete selection. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding, but financial support was received from the School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia. R.J.A. is a scientific advisor to Memphasys Ltd, a biotechnology company with interests in reproductive health and responsible for developing the Felix™ electrophoretic sperm isolation device. R.J.A. receives salary and grant from, and has stock in, Memphasys Ltd. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologiescapacitationmale infertilityspermatozoa/spermsperm DNA qualitysperm functionsperm selectionsperm–zona pellucida bindingzona pellucida

Identifiers

PMID40698010
PMCPMC12282954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.