ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Lipoprotein(a) as an early marker of cardiovascular events in high-risk subjects: insights from the Moli-sani cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, residual risk, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Identifying barriers to lipoprotein(a) testing in secondary cardiovascular prevention and co-designing implementation strategies: an Italian behavior change wheel-informed study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Epidemiological studies have revealed the role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in the etiopathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We analyzed the association between Lp(a) and the risk of a major cardiovascular event in subjects with previous CVD. Methods: The analysis was conducted on the Moli-sani study population (24,325 individuals aged ≥35 years, recruitment from 2005 to 2010), focusing on subjects with prior CVD. Data from standardized questionnaires and blood pressure, anthropometric, and lab measurements were collected. Lp(a) levels were measured using biobanked samples. The cohort was followed for cardiovascular events. The association between Lp(a) levels and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. Results: In total, 1,284 subjects reported a history of CVD at baseline. The mean ± SD Lp(a) level was 23.3 ± 26.0 mg/dl and 51 subjects (4.0%) had levels ≥90 mg/dl. After a median of 7.3 years, 307 CVD events were recorded and validated. Subjects belonging to the highest Lp(a) level group (≥90 mg/dl) showed a worse trend during early follow-up compared with the lowest level group (<30 mg/dl), with a peak during the first 18 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43-8.27]. This increase was higher in subjects with dyslipidemia not treated with statins and those with multiple previous CVD events (HR = 11.0, 95% CI: 1.98-61.1; HR = 25.6, 95% CI: 7.83-83.8). Conclusions: High Lp(a) levels were associated with an increased risk of early secondary cardiovascular events in individuals with a history of multiple CVDs or non-treated dyslipidemia, suggesting that lipoprotein(a) is a modifiable biomarker that can be measured at different times for CVD risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.