ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation plus pregabalin for radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancer (RELAX): a phase 2 randomised trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05543239 (Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Radiotherapy-Related Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Head and Neck Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Radiotherapy-Related Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Head and Neck Cancers: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy-Associated Pain in Head and Neck Cancer: From Clinical Burden to Neuroimmune Modulator.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Thematic evolution and research trends in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 1992 to 2024.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in breast cancer: a neuroimmune model to improve quality of life.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Research Progress of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Analgesia following Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy dosimetry oversights in the RELAX trial: implications for interpreting taVNS efficacy in neuropathic pain.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Electroacupuncture Versus Auricular Acupressure Versus WaitliSt Control for Endocrine Therapy-Related Joint Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer (EASE): Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid relief of radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain (RRNP) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is challenging when relying solely on pharmacologic treatments, especially in the early stages of medication. Whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can effectively and rapidly control the RRNP in HNC survivors remains uncertain. Methods: The RELAX trial was a randomised, parallel, sham-controlled trial conducted at four centres in China. We randomly assigned (1:1) HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP (as defined by Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score of ≥4) to receive taVNS or sham stimulation (concha of the left ear) for 30 min twice daily over 7 days. Participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians were blinded to assignment and intervention. All patients also received a basal dose of pregabalin (75 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was pain intensity reduction, as measured by the change of NRS scores from baseline to day 7. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05543239. Findings: Between September 16, 2022, and December 1, 2023, 116 eligible patients (mean age, 50.8 [standard deviation (SD), 8.8] years; 40 [34.5%] were women) were randomly assigned into groups. All patients completed NRS score at baseline and day 7, and 112 (96.6%) completed 80% or more of the intervention course. The pain intensity at baseline was 5.79 (SD, 1.59) in the taVNS group and 5.66 (SD, 1.54) in the control group. At day 7, pain intensity decreased by 2.43 (SD, 2.19) in the taVNS group and 1.12 (SD, 1.64) in the Control group; between-group difference, 1.31 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-2.02; P = 0.00042). The most common adverse event (AE) related to taVNS was mild, transient local skin irritations at the electrode site (8.6% versus 1.7%, P = 0.21), and no serious AE were associated with the device. Interpretation: In this trial, taVNS for 7 days at the initial stage of pregabalin treatment resulted in significantly better pain relief in HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP with no serious AE. Further prospective investigations to observe the longer term effects of taVNS on RRNP are warranted. Funding: This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province and Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.