ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025
Exploring patient-reported outcomes and morbidity burden of patients with VEXAS syndrome: a scoping review.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myelodysplasia in VEXAS syndrome.Blood advances · 2026Review
- An Italian cartography of VEXAS-related thrombosis.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- VEXAS syndrome unmasked from relapsing polychondritis and infection mimicry: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- VEXAS syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, auto-inflammatory, somatic) is a recently discovered syndrome of autoinflammatory origin affecting mainly older patients with a clinical picture encompassing a variety of hematological and rheumatological conditions. We aimed to gather current knowledge on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and morbidity burden of VEXAS patients. Methods: A scoping review conducted via PubMed (last updated September 2024) identified studies involving VEXAS patients, excluding studies primarily addressing hematologic adverse events or laboratory parameters, with no lower date restriction. A double-review process was applied from screening to data charting. Outcomes included the prevalence of manifestations of VEXAS-related morbidity burden and their aggregated rates, adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Findings: Out of 357 records, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, analyzing 1437 patients. The median study sample size was 40 patients (IQR 16-59). Most studies (96·8%) were non-interventional and mostly conducted in France (38·7%) and the USA (32·3%). The median age at symptom onset was 67 years (IQR 66-68·6). Myelodysplastic syndrome was the most common concomitant disease, present in 93·6% of studies. No studies documenting PROs were identified. Skin and pulmonary involvement were the most frequently reported manifestations, appearing in 100% and 96·8% of studies, respectively. Moreover, skin lesions had the highest median prevalence (83·6%, IQR 76-90), followed by fever (81·2%, IQR 67·5-89) and general constitutional symptoms (76%, IQR 54·8-85·3). All symptoms identified in this review were clinician-reported. Interpretation: Our findings may provide preliminary insights into future PRO assessment strategies for VEXAS syndrome. We also advocate for international concerted efforts for a rapid uptake of PRO evidence-based data that can help inform the development of patient-centric therapies for this rare disease. Funding: This work was supported by AIRC5×1000 call "Metastatic disease: the key unmet need in oncology" to MYNERVA project, #21267 Myeloid Neoplasms Research Venture AIRC. Detailed description is available at http://www.progettoagimm.it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.