Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697881›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025

Applying Field and Genomic Epidemiology Methods to Investigate Transmission Networks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) in Domestic Poultry in British Columbia, Canada (2022-2023).

Krista Howden, Shannon K French, Manon Racicot, Anthony V Signore, Caitlyn Best, Jacklyn Perrey, Troy Bourque, Yohannes Berhane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Krista HowdenCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Calgary, Alberta T2E 9B2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-3648
Shannon K FrenchCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Guelph, Ontario N1G 4S9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-4123
Manon RacicotCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-5901
Anthony V SignoreNational Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3M4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0664-0864
Caitlyn BestCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Parksville, British Columbia V9P 1V7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4307-4283
Jacklyn PerreyCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Abbotsford, British Columbia V2T 6W3, Canada.
Troy BourqueCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Calgary, Alberta T2E 9B2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5518-6733
Yohannes BerhaneNational Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3M4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-6043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus A (H5N1) was first detected in North America in 2021. Ongoing spillover events from wild to domestic birds and subsequent transmission between domestic birds resulted in Canada's largest recorded epidemic of HPAI. Between December 2021 and April 2024, 422 A (H5N1) outbreaks in domestic birds were confirmed in Canada. Of these, 158 (37%) occurred in British Columbia (BC). This study integrates field and genomic epidemiology (GE) results to investigate the potential for lateral or local spread between infected poultry farms in BC. Five genetically distinct viral clusters were identified during this period. Among the 31 noncommercial premises, 27 (87.1%) were classified as independent introductions, while four premises (12.9%) were attributed to local spread within 10 km of a phylogenetically connected infected premises (IP). No lateral spread events were identified among noncommercial premises. All infected noncommercial premises housed birds with outdoor access, emphasizing their susceptibility to wild bird exposure. Of the 127 infected commercial poultry premises, 21 (16.5%) were classified as independent introductions, 82 (64.6%) as local spread, 18 (14.2%) with potential for lateral spread, five (3.9%) with potential for both local and/or lateral spread, and one (0.8%) for which sequencing was unavailable. Local spread emerged as a prominent feature, with most IP in proximity to one another having genetically similar viruses. Results suggest that proximity (<200 m) to an IP was a more reliable predictor of future infection status than contact with an IP. These findings underscore the critical value of combining field and GE to understand outbreak dynamics comprehensively. This integrative approach improves resource allocation, informs targeted containment strategies, and supports the need for effective biosecurity measures to mitigate future risks, particularly in densely populated poultry production regions. Robust interventions are needed to address both independent introductions and secondary spread pathways.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsBritish ColumbiaDisease OutbreaksGenomicsPhylogenyPoultry

Identifiers

PMID40697881
PMCPMC12283179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.