Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697864›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Frequency of light fluctuations affects tomato morphology and physiology only at extreme amplitudes.

J Anja Dieleman, Guido van Steekelenburg, Kees Weerheim, Elias Kaiser, Esther Meinen, Mark van Hoogdalem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J Anja DielemanWageningen University and Research, Business Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Guido van SteekelenburgWageningen University and Research, Business Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Kees WeerheimWageningen University and Research, Business Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Elias KaiserHorticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Esther MeinenWageningen University and Research, Business Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Mark van HoogdalemWageningen University and Research, Business Unit Greenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electricity prices can fluctuate considerably during the day due to the dependency of solar and wind energy and varying demands. Fluctuating lighting regimes might thus be economically attractive. However, only limited knowledge is available on how plants grow under fluctuating light conditions. The aims of this study were (1) to determine effects of fluctuating light intensities on plant biomass, morphology and physiology and (2) to determine whether frequency or amplitude of the fluctuations is the main determining factor of such effects. Methods: Young tomato plants were grown under fluctuating light conditions in a range of amplitudes (200/0, 175/25, 125/75 and 100/100 µmol m Results: Plants grown under extreme light fluctuations of 0/200 µmol m Discussion: These results indicate that the frequency of light fluctuations determines plant biomass, morphology and physiology only at extreme amplitudes of light fluctuations. However, when a minimum light level is maintained, the crop can integrate these light fluctuations, maintaining crop growth and development.

Indexed as

adaptationdynamic lightingLEDphotosynthesisplant morphology

Identifiers

PMID40697864
PMCPMC12279503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.