Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697859›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Sticky plants and plant-based glues: potential for pest control.

Thijs V Bierman, Young H Choi, T Martijn Bezemer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thijs V BiermanAbove-Belowground Interactions Group, Institute of Biology, Sylviusweg, Leiden, Netherlands.
Young H ChoiNatural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology Leiden, Sylviusweg, Leiden, Netherlands.
T Martijn BezemerAbove-Belowground Interactions Group, Institute of Biology, Sylviusweg, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many vascular plants produce adhesive substances that may trap arthropods for their own protection, nutrition, and to engage in mutualistic relationships with predatory arthropods. While the role of stickiness in plant defense is well established, our understanding of the mechanisms and factors that determine the successful capture of arthropods by sticky plants and how we can utilize this knowledge to increase the sustainability of our agricultural practices is still limited. We review the literature on arthropod-trapping sticky plants and plant-based adhesive use in agriculture. There are many factors involved in the successful capture of arthropods by sticky plants, including: plant morphology, glue chemistry, the use of visual cues and volatiles to affect arthropod behavior, environmental factors, and adaptations of arthropods in their behavior, morphology, and chemistry to avoid being captured. Considering agricultural potential, using sticky crops as trap plants and ameliorating crops with sticky features could be useful for crop protection, but practical application is scarce. The same is true for the use of sticky plant specialist arthropod predators. Furthermore, plant-based adhesives are becoming more popular in agriculture for example, as glues for sticky traps, as sprayable adhesives for physical plant protection, and as carriers of botanicals and pesticides. So far, these adhesives see only small-scale use and are often less effective in the field than in the laboratory. Before plant stickiness and plant-based glues can be fully utilized for crop protection, several technological and resource related challenges must also first be overcome.

Indexed as

agriculturearthropod trappingbio-basedbiological controltrichomes

Identifiers

PMID40697859
PMCPMC12279788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.