ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of health care systems in European Union countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public Perceptions on the Efficiency of National Healthcare Systems Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the national healthcare systems of European Union countries used their medical potential in the fight against COVID-19. The analyzed period covered the years before the pandemic 2009-2018 and the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis was conducted for all European Union's countries. It concerned the evaluation not only of the effectiveness of treatment, but also of the efficiency, i.e., the use of resources in healthcare systems. Study design: Descriptive and analytical study on EUROSTAT data, Health Consumer Powerhouse, OECD Health Statistics, European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) and World Health Organization (WHO). Methodology: An index was proposed to measure the quality of healthcare systems' activities, which simultaneously assesses the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. The treatment results depend not only on management, but also on financial resources. EHCI, HLY, % of unmet medical needs were used to assess the effectiveness of treatment. Efficiency was calculated using with the DEA method based on total healthcare expenditure per capita at purchasing power parity. The final assessment is based on the difference in the index value from the pandemic period and before the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The healthcare systems of small EU countries coped most effectively and efficiently during the COVID-19 pandemic: Denmark (0.6), Estonia (0.5), Austria (0.5), Slovenia (0.3), and the Czech Republic (0.3). However, large and non-rich EU countries fared much worse: Spain (-0.8), Hungary (-0.7) and Poland (-0.4). This group also unexpectedly included the Netherlands (-0.3)-a small, wealthy country that coped poorly with the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Based on the analysis carried out in this paper, it can be concluded that the optimal (efficient and effective) use of medical resources did not depend only on the state of ownership and technological advancement of healthcare systems (!). The involvement of medical staff, society, and decisions of state authorities were equally significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.