ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Empowering tomorrow's public health researchers and clinicians to develop digital health interventions using chatbots, virtual reality, and other AI technologies.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in public health education: current evidence, competencies, and a framework for responsible integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Bridging medical education and public health: a pedagogical model to develop future physicians' capacity in audience-tailored health communication.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based digital health interventions incorporating technologies like chatbots and augmented/virtual reality are reshaping the healthcare delivery landscape. The rollout of these technologies warrants updated graduate curricula to train future healthcare professionals. In response, the authors incorporated additional topics relevant to digital health intervention development into a graduate-level digital health communication course and evaluated student feedback. Methods: The authors developed four lectures on two-/one-way digital health messaging strategies, AI/large language models, chatbots, and augmented/virtual reality, and a chatbot development tutorial as a lab. They evaluated students' perceptions of the course and the benefits of the new content after course completion through standard and supplemental course evaluations. Results: Eleven of 16 enrolled students completed the course evaluation, and 8 completed the supplemental survey. Most students were from the school of public health and reported female gender. One of 8 students completing the survey reported prior experience creating chatbot and AR/VR content. The overall average course rating was high (7.45 out of 9). Open-ended survey responses about the new content were mixed with enthusiasm and questions about its relevance over content on traditional communication modalities in preparation for public health work. Conclusion: Student feedback underscored course content value, along with guidance to better emphasize how chatbots and augmented/virtual reality are relevant to clinical and public health practices. More applications relevant for diverse populations could elucidate the value of new technologies for students who will develop digital-based interventions. Applications focusing on commonalities could also solidify students' understanding of intervention development principles that will remain, as technologies evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.