Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697743›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

The interplay between migration and self-identity: a structured review using TCCM and bibliometric analysis.

Harshita Barua, Nidhi Maheshwari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harshita BaruaCentre of Excellence for the Science of Happiness, Delhi Technological University (DTU), Main Campus, Delhi, India.
Nidhi MaheshwariUniversity School of Management and Entrepreneurship (USME), Delhi Technological University (DTU), East Delhi Campus, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores the intricate relationship between migration and self-identity, emphasizing how the migratory process extends beyond geographic movement to impact individuals' cultural, social, and psychological landscapes. As migrants adapt to new environments, shifts in language, traditions, and social norms may challenge their sense of belonging and self-concept, potentially resulting in identity conflicts and reduced confidence-particularly in workplace settings. Methods: A bibliometric review was conducted to systematically analyze the literature on migration and self-identity. Data were sourced from the Web of Science database. Analytical tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny were employed to map co-citation patterns, thematic clusters, and emerging trends. Additionally, the Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology (TCCM) framework guided the synthesis of research gaps and future directions. Results: The analysis identified dominant research themes such as acculturation, identity negotiation, and sociocultural adaptation challenges. Most studies focus on Western host societies and adult migrant populations. However, there is a growing yet underexplored body of work on second-generation migrants and identity development in non-Western contexts. Discussion: Findings suggest a pressing need for more inclusive research across diverse cultural settings. Practically, organizations should recognize the impact of migration on self-identity and implement culturally sensitive policies to support migrant integration. Managerial implications include promoting inclusive workplace cultures through diversity training and mental health support programs.

Indexed as

acculturationbibliometric reviewco-citationcultural adaptationmigrationself-identityTCCMthematic mapping

Identifiers

PMID40697743
PMCPMC12282484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.