SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Therapeutic potential of quercetin in depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in the Brain-Gut Axis in the Development and Progression of Depression.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Review
- Flavonoids as Modulators of Neuroinflammation in Affective Disorders: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Edible Bird's Nest as a Multi-Component Functional Food for Brain Aging: From Single-Bioactive Actions to Network-Regulatory Mechanisms.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is a common and severe mental disorder. Quercetin, a natural flavonoid compound, has been shown in several studies through animal experiments to improve depressive symptoms, demonstrating significant antidepressant potential. Objective: This study represents the first preclinical meta-analysis on quercetin and depression, aiming to systematically evaluate the antidepressant effects of quercetin in animal studies. Methods: This study conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science electronic databases, with the search period covering from the inception of the databases to January 2025. Subsequently, the SYRCLE risk of bias assessment tool was used for quality evaluation, and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: This systematic review included 52 animal studies for random-effects meta-analysis. The results indicated that, compared to the control group, quercetin significantly reduced the immobility time in the forced swimming test and tail suspension test, as well as the time spent in the closed arms of the elevated plus maze. Simultaneously, it increased sucrose preference, swimming time in the forced swimming test, total distance traveled in the open field test, time spent in the central area, and the number of entries into the central area. In the elevated plus maze test, quercetin also increased the time spent in the open arms and the number of entries into the open arms. However, it did not produce a significant effect on the number of standing episodes in the open field test. Moreover, quercetin increased the levels of glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), while reducing the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and corticosterone (CORT). Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that quercetin significantly improves depressive symptoms. However, further high-quality studies are needed to explore the role of quercetin in antidepressant research. Systematic Review Registration: http://inplasy.com/, Identifier: INPLASY202530047.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.