Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697618›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Comparison of Medicaid financing for birth centers: a nine-state policy analysis.

Rebecca H Ofrane, Leslie Kantor, Julie Blumenfeld, Slawa Rokicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca H OfraneDepartment of Urban-Global Health, Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Leslie KantorDepartment of Urban-Global Health, Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Julie BlumenfeldDivision of Advanced Nursing Practice, Rutgers University School of Nursing, Newark, NJ, United States.
Slawa RokickiDepartment of Urban-Global Health, Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The United States continues to face poor maternal health outcomes, and freestanding birth centers are a safe alternative to hospitals, offering midwifery care for low-risk birthing people. Not all birth centers accept Medicaid patients, however, and among those that do, low Medicaid facility reimbursement rates are a barrier to birth center operations and sustainability. This limits access especially for low-risk birthing people of color who may perceive traditional hospital care to be unsafe or culturally unsupportive. Methods: This cross-sectional policy analysis explored variation in U.S. Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth center facility fees. State similarity methods were used to match comparable states to New Jersey due to the state's evolving policy environment, resulting in a nine-state sample for the policy analysis. Results: Of this sample, six had published Medicaid rates for the birth center facility fee, with wide variation among the states, New Jersey's being the lowest and Massachusetts the highest, at four-and-a-half times New Jersey's rate. Significant variation in reimbursement rates was also identified when transfer to a hospital occurs. Conclusions: The findings suggest the importance of Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth centers as a policy pathway to improving access to this under-utilized care setting.

Indexed as

birth centershealth economicshealth policymaternal healthMedicaidmidwives

Identifiers

PMID40697618
PMCPMC12279815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.