ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2025
Limitations of glycated hemoglobin and emerging biomarkers for diabetes care after bariatric surgery.
Article in World journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between time in range and incident early diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery significantly improves glycemic control and can lead to type 2 diabetes remission. However, the reliability of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a type 2 diabetes biomarker post-surgery can be confounded by conditions such as anemia and gastrointestinal complications. Hence, we explored the use of alternative biomarkers such as glycated albumin (GA), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) to monitor glycemic control more effectively in post-bariatric surgery patients. Measuring GA and 1,5-AG levels can detect glycemic variability more sensitively than HbA1c, especially under non-fasting conditions. GA shows promise for short-term monitoring post-surgery while 1,5-AG could be useful for real-time glucose monitoring. IGFBP-1 can be used to monitor metabolic improvement and to predict HbA1c normalization. However, challenges in assay standardization and cost remain significant barriers to their clinical adoption. Although these biomarkers could offer a more personalized approach to glucose monitoring (thereby addressing the limitations of utilizing HbA1c in this endeavor in post-bariatric surgery patients), this would require overcoming technical, logistical, and cost-related challenges. While using GA, 1,5-AG, and IGFBP-1 shows promise for glycemic monitoring, further research and validation are crucial for their routine clinical implementation, especially in the context of diabetes management post-bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.