ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Carotid artery dissection recanalization: imaging modalities, influencing factors, and therapeutic perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a preoperative prediction model for vascular recanalization in cervical artery dissection based on HR-VWI radiomics features combined with clinical risk factors.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Clinical and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ischemic stroke in cervical artery dissection.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid artery dissection (CAD) is a rare cause of ischemic stroke, and its prognosis is often poor. If not diagnosed and treated in time, it may lead to serious complications such as intracranial stroke and even death. Accurate diagnosis of CAD, formulation of reasonable treatment plans, and prediction of vascular recanalization are crucial for improving the prognosis of patients. However, there is currently a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials to provide guidance for clinical practice, and the industry has not yet reached a unified consensus on the standardized diagnosis and treatment of CAD. Therefore, this article reviews the imaging examination methods for recanalization of CAD, the analysis of related factors affecting recanalization, and the methods of recanalization treatment, and combines the latest research progress to provide a perspective on the recanalization of carotid artery dissection, aiming to provide a reference basis for the precise diagnosis and treatment of CAD recanalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.