ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score for predicting all-cause mortality in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction: a cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunonutritional status and survival after cardiac arrest: prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index, the cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index, and the controlling nutritional status score in post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation intensive care patients.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Albumin-based nutritional-inflammatory indices and prognosis in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction: a MIMIC-IV cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Nutritional Indices Are Associated with Mortality in the Elderly Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Comparative Study of CONUT, GNRI, and PNI.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, a novel marker reflecting the malnutrition, has been demonstrated to predict all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a wide range of diseases. The research intends to assess the clinical effects of malnutrition on patients who have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we consecutively enrolled 3258 patients diagnosed with AMI from 2010 to 2016. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the CONUT score: normal, mild malnutrition, and moderate and severe malnutrition. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We develop cox proportional hazards models to investigate the relationship between the CONUT score and all-cause mortality among patients who underwent PCI after AMI. Results: According to the assessment via the CONUT score, a total of 43.7% patients experienced mild malnutrition, and 4.8% patients experienced moderate and severe malnutrition. During a median follow-up period of 8.6 years, there were 610 patients (18.7%) suffered from all-cause mortality. As malnutrition severity intensified, the occurrence of the primary endpoint saw a steady rise. After adjusting for multiple variables, the group classified with moderate and severe malnutrition exhibited an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.15, Conclusion: Malnutrition is prevalent among patients with AMI and is significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause mortality. As a nutritional assessment tool, the CONUT score effectively aids in risk stratification and predicts poor prognosis in patients. Additional prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate the influence of nutritional interventions on outcomes in patients undergoing PCI after AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.