Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697444›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Perceptions of nursing informatics on quality of nursing practice and competency among nurses in Jordan.

Rami Alnajjar, Amr Zyoud, Hanan Al-Shamaly, Abdelrhman Tamimi, Moath AbedRabbu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rami AlnajjarClinical Nursing Department, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Amr ZyoudPrimary Department, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Hanan Al-ShamalyNursing Department, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.
Abdelrhman TamimiClinical Nursing Department, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Moath AbedRabbuNursing Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of nursing informatics and its specific components, such as the EHR/EMR comes with an array of positive implications. However, these benefits are poorly explored in Jordan as a country where digitized nursing information still struggles through challenges. Objectives: This research was conducted to examine the perceptions on the nursing informatics towards quality of clinical nursing practice, and to determine how nursing informatics affect clinical competency among nurses. Methods: Quantitative research was conducted between September 2018 and May 2023. Data was collected using a research questionnaire administered to 256 clinical nurses in three government hospitals in Amman government, Jordan. The hospitals that were part of the study are the following: Prince Hussein bin Abdullah Hospital, Al-Bashir Hospital and Dr. Jamil Al-Totangi Hospital. Analysis of data was done using SPSS (version 26) and SPSS-AMOS. Results: The respondents expressed that nursing informatics ensures a quality of clinical nursing practice in clinical nursing care plan, use of nursing informatics, quality of patient care, clinical nurse's competency and patient safety. Further statistical analysis showed that that there is a statistically significant effect of nursing informatics on the competency of clinical nurses ( Conclusion: Nursing informatics has various significant benefits that relate to quality of clinical practice and nurses' competency, as perceived by the Jordanian clinical nurses. Recommendation: Comprehensive adoption of nursing informatics in Jordanian hospitals may help improve the overall quality of patients' care.

Indexed as

clinical nursing practiceelectronic health recordsEMR (electronic medical record)nurses' competencynursing informatics

Identifiers

PMID40697444
PMCPMC12281827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.