ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology
Early-onset colorectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years: a systematic review of the literature.
Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Gut Microbiota on the Clinical Course and Treatment Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of early-onset advanced colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: From Epidemiologic Shift to Life-Course Carcinogenesis and Age-Attuned Care.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Place of Death Among Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Decedents in the United States, 1999-2020: National Trends and Disparities.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Long-term survival and clinical characteristics of colon and rectal cancer: a comprehensive 47-year retrospective analysis using the SEER database.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy for Screening: What Matters Most?Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Symptom Awareness, and Referral Practices of Primary Care Providers in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Population health management · 2026Article
- Differential Plasma Expression of sTNF-R, TNF-α, PDGF-AA, IL-17A, and IL-1β Across the Colorectal Neoplasia Spectrum.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Temporal trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Greece, 2014-2022: a Joinpoint regression analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) refers to CRC diagnosed before the age of 50. Its incidence has risen in recent years, turning researchers' attention to its oncologic behavior and potentially modifiable risk factors. In this review, PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for all original research articles concerning EO-CRC. The inclusion criteria were CRC patients under 50, without a known predisposing factor for malignancy or an inherited CRC syndrome, presenting oncological characteristics and outcomes. All studies were assessed for bias, based on the ROBINS-E 2022 tool, and were synthesized in a qualitative analysis. Twenty-nine articles, reporting on 64,376 EO-CRC patients, were included in the qualitative synthesis. Results were classified into 3 categories: a) demographics; b) histopathologic characteristics; and c) treatment outcomes. Of these publications, 21 studies agreed that rectum (45%) and left-sided (47.1%) cancers are most common in younger patients, and 5 indicated that the highest prevalence of CRC concerns the 40-49 years age group. Seventeen of 29 studies reported a higher stage (III and IV) on diagnosis, with lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Our review has some limitations: as it was based on a single database, not all studies provided information on the variables; and patients were not categorized in all studies in the same age groups, although all were under 50 years. As EO-CRC is on the rise, the need for closer monitoring and possibly earlier screening becomes apparent. Further research should focus on finding novel screening biomarkers and modifiable risk factors that would decrease mortality and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.