Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697438›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology

Endoscopic treatment modalities for the management of gastroparesis: a critical review.

Dimitrios I Ziogas, Anastasios Manolakis, Konstantinos Argyriou, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Elias Grivas, Andreas Kapsoritakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitrios I ZiogasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece (Dimitrios I. Ziogas).
Anastasios ManolakisUniversity of Thessaly, School of Medicine, Larisa, Greece (Dimitrios I. Ziogas, Anastasios Manolakis, Konstantinos Argyriou, Andreas Kapsoritakis).
Konstantinos ArgyriouUniversity of Thessaly, School of Medicine, Larisa, Greece (Dimitrios I. Ziogas, Anastasios Manolakis, Konstantinos Argyriou, Andreas Kapsoritakis).
Ioannis S PapanikolaouHepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou).
Elias GrivasDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Central Clinic of Athens, Athens, Greece (Elias Grivas).
Andreas KapsoritakisUniversity of Thessaly, School of Medicine, Larisa, Greece (Dimitrios I. Ziogas, Anastasios Manolakis, Konstantinos Argyriou, Andreas Kapsoritakis).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroparesis, a chronic condition with complex etiopathogenesis, is associated with considerable symptom burden and significant morbidity. Dietary modifications and pharmacotherapy exhibit limited long-term efficacy, while surgical interventions are characterized by higher morbidity and variable efficacy. Endoscopic procedures, because of their less invasive nature, have been the focus of past and ongoing research. The majority of endoscopic treatment modalities target the pylorus: e.g., gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin injection, pyloric balloon dilatation, and transpyloric stent placement. Endoscopic feeding tube placement, endoscopic gastric electrical stimulation, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy have also been used to treat gastroparesis; however, these procedures are less well-studied. This critical review provides a detailed overview of the available endoscopic procedures for the management of gastroparesis, with emphasis on their pros and cons, quality of data and overall efficacy.

Indexed as

Botoxendoscopic treatmentGastroparesisG-POEMstent

Identifiers

PMID40697438
PMCPMC12277523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.