ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology
Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.
Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Inpatient Trajectories After Splenic Artery Embolization in Cirrhosis: Real-World Evidence from Kazakhstan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Liver Cirrhosis: A Clinical Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Role of Grey Scale and Color Doppler in the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) represents one of the strongest predictive biomarkers for disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Chronic liver injury triggers both intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms, giving rise to an increasing portal pressure and a self-perpetuating cycle with worsening risks of liver-related complications and mortality. Diagnosing CSPH becomes challenging in patients with advanced but compensated chronic liver disease where CSPH is not apparent clinically. Approximately 60% of patients with cACLD will have CSPH, representing a critical window for intervention to reduce portal pressure and prevent complications. The current gold standard for portal pressure measurement, the hepatic venous pressure gradient, is impractical for widespread use. Emerging diagnostic tools aim to address this limitation. Techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and noninvasive approaches using imaging methods, elastography (targeting liver and/or spleen) and serum markers, offer alternatives for CSPH detection, and moreover, can guide treatment decisions. Non-selective beta-blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with CSPH. Unfortunately, they remain the only approved therapy for CSPH and they are not effective in reducing portal pressure in all patients, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic options as well as practical methods to evaluate treatment response. Recent innovations and ongoing research are steering the field toward a more personalized approach, where diagnosis, treatment and follow up are tailored to individual patient risk profiles. This evolution holds the potential to improve outcomes in patients with CSPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.