Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40697432›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology

Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma VanderschuerenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman).
Schalk van der MerweDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman).
Wim LalemanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) represents one of the strongest predictive biomarkers for disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Chronic liver injury triggers both intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms, giving rise to an increasing portal pressure and a self-perpetuating cycle with worsening risks of liver-related complications and mortality. Diagnosing CSPH becomes challenging in patients with advanced but compensated chronic liver disease where CSPH is not apparent clinically. Approximately 60% of patients with cACLD will have CSPH, representing a critical window for intervention to reduce portal pressure and prevent complications. The current gold standard for portal pressure measurement, the hepatic venous pressure gradient, is impractical for widespread use. Emerging diagnostic tools aim to address this limitation. Techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and noninvasive approaches using imaging methods, elastography (targeting liver and/or spleen) and serum markers, offer alternatives for CSPH detection, and moreover, can guide treatment decisions. Non-selective beta-blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with CSPH. Unfortunately, they remain the only approved therapy for CSPH and they are not effective in reducing portal pressure in all patients, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic options as well as practical methods to evaluate treatment response. Recent innovations and ongoing research are steering the field toward a more personalized approach, where diagnosis, treatment and follow up are tailored to individual patient risk profiles. This evolution holds the potential to improve outcomes in patients with CSPH.

Indexed as

beta-blockerselastographynoninvasive testPortal hypertension

Identifiers

PMID40697432
PMCPMC12277511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.