ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
The Impact of Genetic Variation on Drug Response in Adult IBD: A Systematic Review.
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From signals to systems: the epigenetic-microbiome-mitochondrial axis in IBD pathogenesis.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- The Impact of Genetic Variation on Drug Response in Adult IBD: A Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Unraveling genetic signatures: the impact of SNPs on therapy response in inflammatory bowel disease patients.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A major characterization of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is significant heterogeneity in treatment responses. Despite the increase in therapeutic agents, discovering an optimal patient-level treatment is still a major milestone. This study aims to provide a systematic review of the existing literature on the predictive biomarkers of the response to IBD treatment. Methods: On April 15, 2025, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases, as well as a manual search. Controlled trials, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies addressing predictive biomarkers for treatment response in adults with IBD were eligible for inclusion. The CASP tool was used to assess the quality of the methodologies employed in the included research. Due to a lack of information and expected heterogeneity, a qualitative study was planned instead of a quantitative one. Results: Of the 7570 identified articles, 31 met the inclusion criteria. DNA markers were assessed as predictive biomarkers. The majority of studies attempted to predict the response to anti-TNF drugs. There is significant variability across studies in both the definition of response and the considered biomarkers. Conclusions: At the moment, no biomarker provides sufficient predictive ability for clinical practice. Thus, we are still in the early stages of the quest for predictive biomarkers, and existing literature is lacking. Future studies should address the large heterogeneity among patients within prospective trials by conducting objective response evaluations. Prediction models are likely to be developed by combining multiple molecular markers from integrated omics levels and clinical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.